jump to navigation

Doctor warns how vitamin D deficiency can generate illness August 4, 2009

Posted by healthandsurvival in Diseases.
Tags: , ,
3 comments

In Vitamin D Prescription: The Healing Power of the Sun and How it Can Save Your Life, Eric Madrid touts the benefits of vitamin D

MENIFEE, Calif. (MMD Newswire) August 4, 2009 — Dr. Eric Madrid’s Vitamin D Prescription: The Healing Power of the Sun and How it Can Save Your Life explores how a lack of vitamin D can lead to increased cancers, osteoporosis, heart disease and more.

More than 80 percent of people are affected by a vitamin D deficiency, says doctor and author Madrid in his provocative new book, Vitamin D Prescription. Vitamin D, says Madrid is the key to health and longevity. He believes the deficiency of this vitamin is a public health hazard and thousands of lives and billions of dollars could be saved if physicians checked their patients’ vitamin D levels and supplemented with vitamin pills.

Relying on research from more than 300 scientific articles, Madrid also warns about the dangers of sunscreen, which may increase cancer risk by decreasing vitamin D blood levels. Getting adequate vitamin D is easy, Madrid claims, and he means for his book to help optimize any individual’s health.

Vitamin D Prescription: The Healing Power of the Sun and how it Can Save Your Life is available for sale online at Amazon.com, BookSurge.com and through additional wholesale and retail channels worldwide.

About the Author
Eric Madrid graduated from the Ohio State University School of Medicine in 2002 and has an active practice at Rancho Family Medical Group in Temecula, Calif. Board-certified in family medicine, he served as chairperson for the Relay for Life in Menifee, sponsored by the American Cancer Society.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Eric Madrid
Email: dremadrid@gmail.com

REVIEW COPIES AND INTERVIEWS AVAILABLE

###

CDC Flu Recommendations- August 2, 2009

Posted by healthandsurvival in Diseases.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

July 30, 2009 (Atlanta, Georgia) — New H1N1 influenza vaccine recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggest priority distribution among 5 groups.

The CDC announced the recommendations in a press conference held after an “urgent” meeting of the Advisory Committee of Immunization Practices yesterday.

Recommended Target Groups

Anne Schuchat, MD, director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases with the CDC, announced that the Advisory Committee of Immunization Practices recommends that 5 target groups receive the vaccine:

  • Pregnant women,
  • household contacts of children who are younger than 6 months of age,
  • healthcare workers and emergency medical services personnel,
  • children and young people between the ages of 6 months and 24 years of age, and
  • nonelderly adults with underlying risk conditions or medical conditions that increase their risk for complications from influenza.

The committee also addressed the issue of what to do in the event of a vaccine shortage and how to prioritize those groups who should receive the vaccine.

“In general, under most circumstances, we really ought to promote vaccine in all of these 5 focus groups, and…picking them or prioritizing some before others would not benefit the public,” Dr. Schuchat said. The CDC’s estimate of the target groups totals 159 million individuals, but “there’s a lot of overlap in some of the groups…[it is] probably a lower number than that,” she said.

“Just in Case” Prioritization Group

However, the Advisory Committee of Immunization Practices also proposed a priority group consisting of a much smaller group, about 41 million individuals, that should be vaccinated in the event of a shortage. These include

  • Pregnant women,
  • household contacts of children who are younger than 6 months of age,
  • healthcare workers and emergency services personnel who have direct patient contact or direct contact with infectious substances,
  • children between the ages of 6 months and 4 years of age, and
  • children 5 to18 years of age who have underlying risk factors that put them at greater risk for complications of influenza.

According to Dr. Schuchat, the real operating assumption is that they will “go forward with the broader group,” she said.

Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Remains Important

According to the CDC, the seasonal influenza vaccine remains very important. “Our assumption is that it is very likely [that seasonal influenza and H1N1 vaccines] can be given together,” Dr. Schuchat told Medscape Infectious Diseases during the briefing. “There will be more data coming out…but it is likely they can be given at the same visit,” she said. According to Dr. Schuchat, 2 doses of the vaccine will probably be needed, with 15 μg antigen/dose.

“The recommendations make sense on the basis of what we know about this virus,” said John Bartlett, MD, chief of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Baltimore, Maryland.

“Of interest is the observation that persons over 64 years, a high priority for seasonal flu vaccine, are not included here,” he told Medscape Infectious Diseases. “That decision is based on the curious observation that the people born before 1957 appear to be relatively well protected from infection or serious disease with this strain of H1N1 virus.” According to Dr. Bartlett, it appears that a similar strain circulated before 1957, accounting for this protection; other comparable viruses also have circulated more recently.

“Pregnant women and young people seem to be especially susceptible to [the H1N1] influenza strain and also to bad outcomes when infected,” he said. “But the elderly should get [the] seasonal flu vaccine, since they account for the vast majority of the 36,000 deaths attributed to seasonal influenza in the average season” he added. “In fact, most people should get seasonal flu vaccine. The current indications for that vaccine apply to about 80% of the US population.”…read rest of story…


Treating Obese is very expensive July 27, 2009

Posted by healthandsurvival in Diseases, Obese.
Tags: , , , , ,
1 comment so far

By BETSY MCKAY

The medical costs of treating obesity-related diseases may have soared as high as $147 billion in 2008, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Monday, as its new director set a fresh tone in favor of more aggressively attacking obesity.

The cost of treating obesity doubled over a decade, signaling the rising prevalence of excess weight and the toll it is taking on the health-care system. The medical costs of obesity were estimated to be $74 billion in 1998, according to a study by federal government researchers and RTI International, a nonprofit research institute in Research Triangle Park, N.C.

The findings were released at a conference on obesity held by the CDC in Washington, D.C. The prevalence of obesity rose 37% between 1998 and 2006, and medical costs climbed to about 9.1% of all U.S. medical costs, the researchers said.

Obese people spent 42% more than people of normal weight on medical costs in 2006, a difference of $1,429, the study found. Prescription drugs accounted for much of the increase.

The numbers underscore the urgent need for deeper interventions in society and the environment that will make it easier for people to maintain normal weight, Thomas Frieden, the CDC’s new director, told conference attendees. While obesity rates among some population groups have shown signs of leveling off, that is of little comfort, he said: The average American is about 23 pounds overweight. Obesity is causing disabilities and exacerbating health disparities, he said. The average American consumes about 250 calories more a day now than two or three decades ago.

“Obesity and with it diabetes are the only major health problems that are getting worse in this country, and they’re getting worse rapidly,” he said.

Change is needed on many fronts, he added. “Reversing obesity is not going to be done successfully with individual effort.”

While the CDC is not a regulatory agency and has only a $43 million budget this year for nutrition, physical activity and obesity programs, it is now stepping up its efforts to combat obesity. Last week, the agency released a set of recommendations to help communities prevent and combat obesity. They include discouraging the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, instituting smaller portion-size options in venues such as government facilities, and requiring physical education in schools.

As New York City’s health commissioner for more than seven years, Dr. Frieden was known for measures such as banning artificial trans fats in some foods and requiring certain chain restaurants to post calorie counts on their menus. In an article published in April in the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Frieden and Kelly Brownell, a professor at Yale University, proposed a penny-an-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened beverages, arguing that those drinks “may be the single largest driver of the obesity epidemic.”

In his speech Monday, Dr. Frieden—who became CDC director in June—said measures that had worked to control tobacco, such as taxes and reducing exposure, could help control obesity, too. Those could include a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. A 10% price increase on sugared beverages could reduce consumption 7.8%, he said.

But he didn’t express the proposal as a policy of the Obama administration. The CDC doesn’t officially endorse an increase in taxes on soda, but cites price increases as a proven strategy for tobacco control and says they should be considered as a strategy for obesity control.

The beverage industry opposes soda-tax proposals. “It’s overreaching when government uses the tax code to tell people what they can eat or drink, said Kevin Keane, a spokesman for the American Beverage Association. “It’s hard to make the connection that there’s a unique tie between soft drinks and obesity.”

Could Vitamin D Have Prevented Farah Fawcett’s Colon Cancer? June 26, 2009

Posted by healthandsurvival in Diet and Nutrition, Diseases, Women's Health.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
4 comments

Farah Fawcett lost her battle with Colon Cancer on July 25th, 2009.  Farah was at  TV superstar from the 1970’s hit show, Charlie’s Angels.   Could her colon cancer had been prevented?  While I do not know the specifics of her case- studies show that up to colon cancer can be reduced by up to 50% when one optimizes their vitamin D levels. Learn more about Vitamin D and cancer risk. Low vitamin D levels are associated with increased risk of breast cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer and more…..

—-BELOW IS AN EXCERPT FROM VITAMIN D PRESCRIPTION BY ERIC MADRID MD, available on Amazon.com—-


Colon Cancer

Colon cancer is one of the top three cancers affecting those in developed countries. According to the American Cancer Society, colon cancer accounts for 8% of all cancer deaths in men and 9% of all cancer deaths in women in the U.S. Colon cancer will affect 1 in 18 men and 1 in 19 women at some point in their lives. Fortunately, the majority of cases can be prevented. Worldwide, the World Health Organization predicts that colon cancer rates will increase 50% by 2020 and will affect up to 20 million people annually.

Risk factors for developing colon cancer include:

  • Colon Polyps
  • Poor diet, especially high in red meats
  • Overweight
  • Obesity
  • Racial Groups (African Americans &  Ashkenazi Jews)
  • Lack of exercise
  • Excess alcohol intake
  • Family history
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Vitamin D deficiency

Those with higher consumption of fruits and vegetables have a benefit in preventing colon cancer from developing in the first place. A 1996 study reported in JAMA suggested that the trace mineral selenium, a potent antioxidant, and part of the glutathione reductase antioxidant complex, could also be protective against precancerous polyps and colon cancer.

There has been renewed interest in the last few years on the ability of sunshine to prevent colon cancer. Specifically, the sunshine vitamin has anti colon cancer properties, observed back in the 1930s, and later confirmed in the 1980s by Cedric Garland, DrPH (Moores Cancer Center University of California, San Diego), and Frank C. Garland, PhD, FACE (Technical Director, Naval Health Research Center (NHRC), San Diego).
Drs. Cedric and Frank Garlands’ landmark study showed that the risk of colon cancer was associated with solar radiation exposure; many other studies have since confirmed this finding. Drs. Garlands’ 1980 study revealed that in the two states with the most solar radiation, New Mexico and Arizona, white males had cancer rates of 6.7 and 10.1, respectively, per 100,000 people. In the three states with the least solar radiation, New York, Vermont, and New Hampshire, white males experienced colon cancer rates of 17.3, 11.3, and 15.3, respectively, per 100,000 population. Data collection occurred from 1959 to 1961. The conclusion was that those with more sunshine exposure had less colon cancer when compared to those with less sunshine exposure.

A review of the CDC web site and the statistics for colon and rectal cancer from 2002–2004 shows similar results. The data today is more inclusive, with men and women from all ethnicities. Arizona and New Mexico have total colon and rectal cancer rates of 49.9 and 51.8, respectively, per 100,000 population. On the contrary, New York, Vermont, and New Hampshire have rates of 63.0, 57.9, and 59.9, respectively, per 100,000 population…..read more about vitamin D and colon cancer when you purchase Vitamin D Prescription by Dr. Eric Madrid

————————————

Heart regenerates itself- April 5, 2009

Posted by healthandsurvival in Diseases, Wellness.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

Heart Muscle Renewed Over Lifetime, Study Finds

In a finding that may open new approaches to treating heart disease, Swedish scientists have succeeded in measuring a highly controversial property of the human heart: the rate at which its muscle cells are renewed during a person’s lifetime.

The finding upturns what has long been conventional wisdom: that the heart cannot produce new muscle cells and so people die with the same heart they were born with.

About 1 percent of the heart muscle cells are replaced every year at age 25, and that rate gradually falls to less than half a percent per year by age 75, concluded a team of researchers led by Dr. Jonas Frisen of the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. The upshot is that about half of the heart’s muscle cells are exchanged in the course of a normal lifetime, the Swedish group calculates. Its results are to be published Friday in the journal Science.

“I think this will be one of the most important papers in cardiovascular medicine in years,” said Dr. Charles Murry, a heart researcher at the University of Washington in Seattle. “It helps settle a longstanding controversy about whether the human heart has any ability to regenerate itself.”

If the heart can generate new muscle cells, researchers can hope to develop drugs that might accelerate the process, since the heart fails to replace cells that are killed in a heart attack.

The dogma that the heart cannot generate new muscle cells has been challenged since 1987 by a somewhat lonely skeptic, Dr. Piero Anversa, now of the Harvard Medical School. Dr. Anversa maintains that heart muscle cells are renewed so fast that a person dying at age 80 has replaced the heart four times over. Many other researchers have doubted this assertion.

Cell turnover rates can easily be measured in animals by making their cells radioactive and seeing how fast they are replaced. Such an experiment, called pulse-labeling, could not ethically be done in people. But Dr. Frisen realized several years ago that nuclear weapons tested in the atmosphere until 1963 had in fact labeled the cells of the entire world’s population.

The nuclear blasts generated a radioactive form of carbon known as carbon-14. The amount of carbon-14 in the atmosphere has gradually diminished since 1963, when above-ground tests were banned, as it has been incorporated into plants and animals or diffused into the oceans.

In the body, carbon-14 in the diet gets into the DNA of new cells and stays unchanged for the life of the cell. Because the level of carbon-14 in the atmosphere falls each year, the amount of carbon-14 in the DNA can serve to indicate the cell’s birth date, Dr. Frisen found.

Four years ago he used his new method to assess the turnover rate of various tissues in the body, concluding that the average age of the cells in an adult’s body might be as young as 7 to 10 years. But there is a wide range of ages — from the rapidly turning over cells of the blood and gut to the mostly permanent cells of the brain.

Dr. Frisen has successfully applied his method to the heart muscle cells, but had to navigate a series of technical obstacles created by the special behavior of the cells. Many have two nuclei, instead of the usual one, and within these double nuclei the DNA may be duplicated again. “I was really impressed at the level of rigor they put into this analysis,” Dr. Murry said, calling it a “scientific tour de force.”…read more…