Palin not really pregant? Covered for 16 year old daughter? August 31, 2008
Posted by healthandsurvival in Politics and Medicine.Tags: Life, news, palin, politics
trackback
Here’s a story that’s filled with salacious gossip, secret pregnancies and unproven sources. In other words, perfect for FameCrawler! There’s a rumor surfacing that Sarah Palin’s fifth child Trig, who was born in April, is actually the child of Palin’s 16-year-old daughter Bristol. According to sources, Sarah Palin’s announcement in early March that she was seven months pregnant came as a shock to those that had worked closely with her, since she did displayed no signs of pregnancy whatsoever during the previous seven months. Here are a couple of other pieces to this story:
- Palin does not appear to be pregnant in any photos taken during her pregnancy. Sources point mainly to the photo below, which was taken of Palin when she would have been almost 7 months pregnant. ….read rest of story here…
Hi -
Actually the baby bump photo is from 2006. Read this article and on page 2 you will see that the Anchorage Daily News (there’s a link to it) says the photo is from 2006. (It’s a gallery.)
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/998402/vp_candidate_sarah_palin_pregnancy.html?cat=75
Also, if you go to forums/msg boards, you will see Alaskan residents saying they know its not true because Bristol doesn’t go to school in Anchorage, the photo is old/wrong, etc. etc.