Daily Archives: May 26, 2008

Drinking water can be harmful to smallest babies


By Anne Harding

Babies younger than six months old should never be given water to drink, physicians at Johns Hopkins Children’s Center in Baltimore remind parents. Consuming too much water can put babies at risk of a potentially life-threatening condition known as water intoxication.

“Even when they’re very tiny, they have an intact thirst reflex or a drive to drink,” Dr. Jennifer Anders, a pediatric emergency physician at the center, told Reuters Health. “When they have that thirst and they want to drink, the fluid they need to drink more of is their breast milk or formula.”

Because babies’ kidneys aren’t yet mature, giving them too much water causes their bodies to release sodium along with excess water, Anders said. Losing sodium can affect brain activity, so early symptoms of water intoxication can include irritability, drowsiness and other mental changes. Other symptoms include low body temperature (generally 97 degrees or less), puffiness or swelling in the face, and seizures.

“It’s a sneaky kind of a condition,” Anders said. Early symptoms are subtle, so seizures may be the first symptom a parent notices. But if a child gets prompt medical attention, the seizures will probably not have lasting consequences, she added.

Water as a beverage should be completely off limits to babies six months old and younger, Anders and her colleagues say. Parents should also avoid using over-diluted formula, or pediatric drinks containing electrolytes.

Anders said it may be appropriate in some cases to give older infants a small amount of water; for example to help with constipation or in very hot weather, but parents should always check with their pediatrician before doing so, and should only give the baby an ounce or two of water at a time.

If a parent thinks their child may have water intoxication, or if an infant as a seizure, they should seek medical attention immediately, she advised.

ADHD can cost adults 20 or more workdays a year


By RANDOLPH E. SCHMID, AP Science Writer

When “Fidgety Philip” grows up, the problems of attention deficit disorder can multiply into loss of nearly a month’s work per year.

Long seen as a problem for children, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder was first described in 1845 by Dr. Heinrich Hoffman, who wrote “The Story of Fidgety Philip.”

More recently, it has been recognized as continuing into adulthood for some people, and new research seeks to estimate the effect of ADHD on workers.

This lack of ability to concentrate costs the average adult sufferer 22.1 days of “role performance,” per year, including 8.7 extra days absent, according to researchers led by Dr. Ron de Graaf of the Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction.

It might be cost-effective for employers to screen workers for ADHD and provide treatment, the researchers suggest.

“There were many more people than most of us who have done these studies had expected,” that were affected by adult ADHD, said Dr. Ronald C. Kessler of Harvard University, a co-author of the report. “People don’t come for treatment for this … it’s kind of one of those hidden things,” he said in a telephone interview.

“It’s an enormous impairment,” Kessler said, citing absences, accidents and low performance on the job.

Kessler said he had worked with workers suffering depression and found that treatment costing $1,000 could help prevent $4,000 in lost productivity.

“It sure looks like the effect would be as big, if not bigger, for ADHD,” he said. “We’re looking around for an employer or two who might be willing to give this a try.”

Linda S. Anderson, president of the Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Association, said workplace assistance and treatment can be vital,

Most people think of ADHD as a children’s problem, but when it continues into adulthood people have a problem coping with the workplace and need assistance, said Anderson, who was not part of the research team.

The new study may underestimate the adult rate of ADHD, she said, noting that many victims may not have jobs. Those who do often struggle to keep up, but there are treatments available, she said.

The majority of the lost performance was associated with reductions in quantity and quality of work rather than actual absenteeism, the researchers said.

Many employers assume occasional absences are part of the cost of doing business, but the paper noted that, “typically they expect their workers to be working when they are on the job.”

To find that most of the ADHD-related loss occurs on days when the worker is present is both striking and disturbing from an employer perspective, the authors said.

Researchers interviewed 7,075 workers aged 18 to 44 in 10 countries, concluding that an average of 3.5 percent had ADHD. Their findings are published in Tuesday’s online edition of the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

In 2006, a study led by Kessler estimated that 4.4 percent of adults aged 18 to 44 in the United States experience ADHD symptoms and some disability.

The new research estimated the U.S. rate at 4.5 percent among workers, costing an average of 28.3 days performance.

The highest rate was for France, 6.3 percent, but the lost time was lower at 20.1 days.

Other countries studied and ADHD rates among adults, and estimated days lost per affected worker, were Lebanon, 0.9 percent, 19.4 days; Spain, 1.3 percent, 1.1 days; Colombia, 1.9 percent, 29.4 days; Mexico, 2.4 percent, 6.1 days; Italy, 3.4 percent, 22.2 days; Germany, 3.5 percent, 13.6 days; Belgium, 3.7 percent, 16.5 days; Netherlands, 4.9 percent, performance improved.

The researchers were unable to explain why the ADHD affected workers in the Netherlands had improved performance rather than the declines seen in every other country studied.

“We periodically find one of those blips, we just don’t know why,” Kessler said.

In a separate study issued earlier this month, researchers led by Kessler reported that major mental disorders cost the U.S. at least $193 billion annually in lost earnings alone. That study was published in the American Journal of Psychiatry.

The new international study was supported by the World Health Organization, U.S. National Institute of Mental Health, John D. and Catharine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Pfizer Foundation, U.S. Public Health Service, Fogarty International Center, Pan American Health Organization, Eli Lilly and Company, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Inc., GlaxoSmithKline and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

___

On the Net:

Occupational and Environmental Medicine: http://oem.bmj.com/

Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Association: http://www.add.org

Scientists test brain pacemakers for depression


By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer

It’s a new frontier for psychiatric illness: Brain pacemakers that promise to act as antidepressants by changing how patients’ nerve circuitry fires.

Scientists already know the power of these devices to block the tremors of Parkinson’s disease and related illnesses; more than 40,000 such patients worldwide have the implants.

But psychiatric illnesses are much more complex and the new experiments with so-called deep brain stimulation, or DBS, are in their infancy. Only a few dozen patients with severe depression or obsessive-compulsive disorder so far have been treated in closely monitored studies.

Still, the early results are promising. Dramatic video shows one patient visibly brightening as doctors turn on her brain pacemaker and she says in surprise: “I’m starting to smile.” And new reports this month show that some worst-case patients — whose depression wasn’t relieved by medication, psychotherapy, even controversial shock treatment — are finding lasting relief.

Six of 17 severely depressed patients were in remission a year after undergoing DBS and four more markedly improved, and more than half of 26 obsessive-compulsive patients showed substantial improvement over three years, say studies from a team at the Cleveland Clinic, Brown University, and Belgium’s University of Leuven.

“Not all patients get better, but when patients respond, it’s significant,” says Dr. Helen Mayberg of Emory University, who has implanted about 50 depression patients. Her first remains in remission after five years; she estimates that four of every six show enough improvement to be classified “responders.”

“We’re rewiring the brain in many ways,” says Dr. Ali Rezai, chief of the Cleveland Clinic’s Center for Neurologic Restoration.

There’s a need for innovative therapies. Up to 20 percent of depression patients and 10 percent of those with obsessive-compulsive disorder are treatment-resistent — several million people in the U.S. alone.

The rationale behind DBS is credible, says Dr. Wayne Goodman of the National Institute for Mental Health: Surgery sometimes helps worst-case patients by destroying misfiring patches of brain tissue. The electrodes are placed into similar spots, but don’t destroy tissue — the electrical signals can be adjusted and turned off.

But it’s not yet ready for prime-time, Goodman cautions. He worries that because the electrodes already are widely available, centers without proper training will start offering the $40,000 implant surgeries to psychiatric patients before science proves if they’re really valuable.

“It is an invasive, experimental procedure,” he warns, with risks including bleeding in the brain and infections. He calls DBS “the last resort for stringently selected patients.”

Earlier this month, federal health officials and the Cleveland Clinic brought together the field’s leading researchers to highlight progress so far and debate if it’s time for much larger studies — even whether DBS might be tweaked to help people with traumatic brain injuries, such as Iraq war veterans.

“There’s not enough awareness of what the potential is of this kind of stimulation,” says meeting co-chair Dr. Margaret Giannini, who heads the government’s Office on Disability.

In deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s, a wire is implanted within a walnut-sized area known as the thalamus, a hub of sensory information. That electrode is connected by a cable running through the neck to a pulse generated under the collarbone. Tiny electrical zaps disable overactive nerve cells, blocking tremors.

Scientists don’t have nearly as much understanding of what goes awry to cause depression or other psychiatric illnesses — but they do know the thalamus isn’t the right spot for those patients. They’re focusing instead on two regions with names only a neurologist could love — the ventral capsule/ventral striatum and so-called Brodmann Area 25. Ignore the names; the point is that these are regions where brain circuitry involved in mood and anxiety intersect.

It’s not yet clear who should have DBS in which spot, or if there are still other target areas. Much of the research to date has been funded by electrode manufacturers, with some paid for by the government — and consists of measuring patients’ disability before and after DBS, not more rigorous studies that randomly assign patients to treatment.

Still, Diane Hire of Cleveland, the patient whose first smile was recorded, illustrates the hope.

The 12-year Navy veteran was medically discharged for depression and spent a decade on disability, unable to function. “I basically felt like a dead person walking. I had no feelings, no emotions,” she told the scientists’ meeting.

Her DBS was switched on in January 2007, and “my whole world changed,” says Hire, 54. She’s not back to work yet: “It is a real challenge to learn how to live as a healthy person again,” she adds, saying she doesn’t handle stress or multitasking well. But, “I wake up every day looking forward to what’s ahead.”

___

EDITOR’s NOTE — Lauran Neergaard covers health and medical issues for The Associated Press in Washington.