Monthly Archives: April 2008

McCain’s Health Care Plan

McCain’s Health-Care Proposal

By Catherine Arnst

Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.), the likely Republican Presidential nominee, stayed true to GOP principles Apr. 29 when he unveiled a health-care reform proposal that leans heavily on competition rather than government intervention. He also wants to see the states take a far greater role in fostering that competition and in forming risk pools that would insure coverage for the sickest citizens.

The last of the three remaining Presidential candidates to unveil a detailed health proposal, McCain’s is also the least radical. He is against mandates, instead proposing universal coverage would emerge through the use of tax credits and a more competitive insurance marketplace. McCain wants to do away with the tax exemption on employer-provided insurance. Instead, he would give a $2,500 annual tax credit to individuals, and $5,000 to families, to purchase their own coverage.

McCain’s plan is meant to encourage individuals to purchase their insurance and free companies from the heavy cost of providing coverage. His theory is that employees would take their tax credit and flock to the open market, where they could shop around for the plan that best meets their needs. Insurance companies would have to become more competitive to win their business.

A Kaiser Family Foundation survey released last year found the average annual premium of an employer-based insurance policy is $12,000, of which employees pay about one-third.

Consumer Control?

Health care in America “should be available to all, and not limited by where you work or how much you make,” McCain said in a speech delivered in Tampa at the University of South Florida’s H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute. He wants to give control over the health-care system to patients. “When families are informed about medical choices, they are more capable of making their own decisions, less likely to choose the most expensive and often unnecessary options, and are more satisfied with their choices.”

For the sickest Americans who would find it hard to buy affordable coverage in an open market, McCain wants the states to form risk pools, or what he calls Guaranteed Access Plans. He also said there would be “reasonable limits” on premiums, and federal assistance for those below a certain income level.

McCain’s campaign staff said the proposal would cost about $10 billion a year in reduced federal tax revenues and subsidized coverage for the poor. The plan’s costs would be offset, in theory, by reduced government payments through Medicare and Medicaid for emergency room use by the uninsured, increased use of information technology, and adoption of best-care practices for chronic illnesses. McCain also proposed malpractice reform.

Contrasts and Criticisms

The plan contrasts sharply with those proposed by the Democratic candidates, Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.). Both of them call for a national public insurance (BusinessWeek.com, 3/31/08) program that would cover everyone at the same rate regardless of their health status. Employers would either have to provide coverage for all employees or contribute to the public program. Clinton also wants a mandate that would require all Americans to get health insurance. Clinton’s plan would cost an estimated $110 billion, offset partly by rolling back Bush Administration tax cuts. Obama’s plan would cost $50 billion to $60 billion, with the same offset.

McCain dismissed the government-centered proposals of the Democratic candidates, saying that if enacted “we will replace the inefficiency, irrationality, and uncontrolled costs of the current system with the inefficiency, irrationality, and uncontrolled costs of a government monopoly.”

Both Democratic candidates were quick to criticize McCain’s proposal, with Clinton calling it a radical approach that could lead to millions losing their employer-based insurance. “While people might have a ‘choice’ of getting such coverage, employers would have no incentive to provide it,” she said in a prepared statement. Obama said in a statement that “John McCain is recycling the same failed policies that didn’t work when George Bush first proposed them, and won’t work now.”

Harvard Business School professor Regina Herzlinger, a leading proponent of consumer choice in health care, says McCain’s plan is both “not enough and too much.” That is, the tax credit is too high for healthy individuals and too low for those with chronic illnesses. She also feels the plan does little to address the high cost of health care.

Medicare “drifting towards disaster”: U.S. official

Medicare “drifting towards disaster”: U.S. official

Medicare is lurching toward disaster and it is too late for the Bush Administration and Congress to do anything about it, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt said on Tuesday.

He said the next administration will have to act to stop rising costs and get control of the $400 billion federal health insurance plan for the elderly, which now covers 44 million people.

“Higher and higher costs are being borne by fewer and fewer people. Sooner or later, this formula implodes,” Leavitt said in a speech to the right-leaning Heritage Foundation and American Enterprise Institute think-tanks.

“There is serious danger here,” he added. “Medicare is drifting towards disaster.”

Leavitt’s speech echoes repeated warnings from other federal government officials who have noted that Medicare spending is projected to be 3.3 percent of gross domestic product in 2009.

A separate report released on Tuesday from the National Cancer Institute estimated that Medicare spent $21 billion on cancer alone between 1999 and 2003.

“The disaster is not inevitable. If we act now, we can change the outcome. In health care, the core problem is that costs are rising significantly faster than costs in the economy as a whole,” Leavitt said.

But the administration of President George W. Bush and the current Congress are out of time, Leavitt said.

“So, given the strong possibility this won’t get fixed in the next 266 days, I would like to add some general advice on the creation of a political construct for action and a general strategy to solve the problem,” Leavitt said, saying he was speaking as a Medicare Trustee and not as a government official.

Leavitt said paying for each medical action separately is wasteful and “it often results in bad referral decisions, sloppy hand-offs, duplications, fraud, and poor quality of care. The result is inappropriate care and unnecessary cost.”

Last week the Government Accountability Office blamed HHS in part for this, saying the agency had not used its powers to force hospitals to provide better care and less waste.

“It troubles me that this matter is not receiving more attention in the presidential candidates’ discussions. The next president will have to deal with this in significant part,” he said.

(Reporting by Maggie Fox, editing by Philip Barbara)

 

Run Your Car On Water- FOX NEWS

This inventor, shown on Fox News, may be onto someting huge! Can we really run our cars on water ? If so, why haven’t we heard more about this?  Running  cars with water could be the cure  our dependence on foreign oil and it appears that this can be done quite inexpensively. However, a more recent post challenges whether oil is really a fossil fuel or not ? What if our supply of oil was actually unlimited after all?

 

5% of World Has 25% of all Prisoners

The United States has less than 5 percent of the world’s population. But it has almost a quarter of the world’s prisoners.

Indeed, the United States leads the world in producing prisoners, a reflection of a relatively recent and now entirely distinctive American approach to crime and punishment. Americans are locked up for crimes — from writing bad checks to using drugs — that would rarely produce prison sentences in other countries. And in particular they are kept incarcerated far longer than prisoners in other nations.

Criminologists and legal scholars in other industrialized nations say they are mystified and appalled by the number and length of American prison sentences.

The United States has, for instance, 2.3 million criminals behind bars, more than any other nation, according to data maintained by the International Center for Prison Studies at King’s College London.

China, which is four times more populous than the United States, is a distant second, with 1.6 million people in prison. (That number excludes hundreds of thousands of people held in administrative detention, most of them in China’s extrajudicial system of re-education through labor, which often singles out political activists who have not committed crimes.)….read rest of story

Tooth fairy giving hundreds of dollars for teeth now-

Bull market in gold means big bucks for old dental work

 By STEVENSON JACOBS, Associated Press Writer Wed

Dazzled by the bull market in gold, people are digging through drawers for old dental caps, fillings and bridgework they saved years ago and selling them at prices that would make the tooth fairy blush.

Instead of hanging on to the pieces as souvenirs, many are turning them over to pawnbrokers, coin shops and specialized firms that buy “dental gold,” hoping to take a bite out of the metal’s historic run to $1,000 an ounce. “People are really cashing in. If a dentist passes away, their kids come in with a big pile of gold teeth,” said Scott Taber, owner of Taber Coins, a Shrewsbury, Mass., coin dealer that buys dental gold and then resells it to a gold smelter.

He said he used to see only a few customers a month selling gold teeth but now gets that many each week. “People are digging up the gold and starting to sell it,” he said. A gold crown typically uses about one-tenth of an ounce of 16-karat gold, which would fetch around $40 to $50 at today’s prices, Taber said.

Heavier pieces of dental gold can command prices of several hundred dollars, he said. That deal sounds pretty good to people like Ann Davis, a 63-year-old retiree in Rock Island, Ill., who had gold caps and a bridge removed nearly 40 years ago and has held on to them ever since. “You don’t want to throw it away because it might be worth something,” she said.

 ”Now that gold’s going up it’s time to think about selling.” Gold prices have been surging since late last year as the weak dollar, record crude-oil prices and fears of a U.S. recession have enhanced its appeal as a haven for investors. Gold set a record of $1,038.60 an ounce on March 17 and has since fallen to about $920, but experts say it could soon resume its upward climb.

Several precious metals analysts have even predicted $2,000 gold ahead as a global commodities boom pushes the price of raw materials further into record territory. That would roughly equal gold’s inflation-adjusted high of the 1980s. Gold crowns, fillings and bridgework are usually made of 16-karat gold, an alloy that contains other metals such as silver, zinc and copper. That made gold dental work soft enough to shape but hard enough to form a biting surface.

Gold is still used to make some crowns, but fillings today are more commonly made of other substances, such as less expensive mercury amalgam or more cosmetically attractive polymer compounds. “There’s a lot of people my age who have excess gold teeth and they don’t know what to do with them,” said Davis, who stashed her dental gold in a bank safe deposit box and recently began looking online for ways to sell it. “They must be valuable or otherwise the dentist wouldn’t give them to you in a bag.”

Recycling dental work isn’t just a U.S. phenomenon. The Japan Denture Recycle Association, which started in December 2006, has recycled 30,000 dentures and raised about $176,500 for charity. Dentures use parts made of gold, silver, palladium and other precious metals, and the project’s leader estimates all the dentures discarded in Japan each year could raise nearly $70 million. But don’t expect to get rich hawking gold fillings and crowns.

Dr. Parviz Azar-Mehr, a dental specialist who runs a private practice in Westwood, Calif., said he often gives patients the dental gold he removes but says it’s rarely enough to sell. “Usually the amount of gold is so little that it’s not significant,” Azar-Mehr said. And replacing a gold crown isn’t cheap. Newer porcelain and gold crowns can cost $500 to $3,000 apiece, and not all insurance companies will pay for the procedure.

Besides the financial benefit, Taber says people don’t mind selling dental gold because it’s far less emotional than parting with heirlooms like grandma’s wedding ring or the family silverware. “I haven’t seen anybody with sentimental teeth,” Taber said.