Virtual Colonoscopy Recommended? March 5, 2008
Posted by healthandsurvival in Diseases, Longevitiy, health, medicine.Tags: cancer, colon cancer, colonoscopy, health, Life, medicine, news
add a comment
New colon cancer screening guides issued
Medical experts recommended Wednesday that a less invasive procedure known as a virtual colonoscopy and a stool DNA test join the arsenal of screenings for colon cancer in the hopes that more people would get checked out.
The recommendations bring to six the number of screening tests suggested for spotting signs of colon cancer, said Dr. Otis Brawley, national chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, one of the groups that made the recommendations.
The tests range in price from a few dollars to several hundred. Which test is best for patients depend on several factors, including what their insurer covers and the preference of their primary care doctor, experts said.
Only one company has a stool DNA test on the market — EXACT Sciences Corp. of Marlborough, Mass. The medical groups delayed releasing the recommendations until markets closed Wednesday because they were concerned it would affect trading, Brawley said.
The recommendations may also mean more business for radiologists. There has been something of a turf battle between gastroenterologists, who perform colonoscopies, and radiologists, who handle virtual colonoscopies.
The new guidelines represent an agreement that both are valuable ways to diagnose and prevent colon cancer, Brawley said.
These first consensus guidelines were released by the Cancer Society, the American College of Radiology, and the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
The latter group comprises representatives from the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Gastroenterological Association and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
The recommendations came out the same day as a medical study that found that flat growths on the colon wall are more common in Americans than previously thought. Researchers concluded that the growths are more likely to be cancerous than the more familiar knobby masses known as polyps.
The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, suggested that more careful colorectal cancer screening is necessary.
However, Brawley said the release of the new recommendations was coincidental and not driven by the study’s findings.
Colorectal cancer is the nation’s second leading cancer killer. It will kill about 50,000 people in the United States this year, the Cancer Society estimates. Screenings are designed to save lives by finding growths before they turn cancerous.
Traditional colonoscopies, long considered the gold standard test, are recommended every 10 years, starting at age 50. A doctor snakes a long, thin tube equipped with a small video camera through the large intestine to view the lining. The doctors also can use the device to cut away a tissue sample or even remove a polyp.
However, colonoscopies come with risks, including a chance that a doctor will accidentally puncture the colon. Also, many people have balked at getting screened because the test is expensive and they perceive it as unpleasant.
A virtual colonoscopy is a sort of super X-ray of the colon and rectum. Air is pumped into the colon to stretch it, and then a special CT scan is done. It is not invasive, but if a polyp is found, doctors will have to perform an optical colonoscopy in order to take a biopsy.
The biggest issue is not which screening a patient should get, but that patients come in for screening. All colon cancer deaths can be averted through screening and early treatment, but only 30 percent of people recommended to get screenings actually do, according to the Cancer Society.
“The challenge we have is getting people to participate in screenings,” said Jack Mandel, an Emory University epidemiologist who has studied colon cancer screening tests. “We can prevent these deaths.”
___
Associated Press writer Carla K. Johnson in Chicago contributed to this report.
(This version CORRECTS the quote in final paragraph to say ‘these’ instead of ‘their’.)
Las Vegas Exposed to HIV and Hepatitis C March 5, 2008
Posted by healthandsurvival in Diseases, Society, Survival, medicine.Tags: Hepatitis, HIV, las vegas, nevada, syringes
3 comments
Vegas clinic may have sickened thousands
Nearly 40,000 people learned this week that a trip to the doctor may have made them sick. In a type of scandal more often associated with Third World countries, a Las Vegas clinic was found to be reusing syringes and vials of medication for nearly four years. The shoddy practices may have led to an outbreak of the potentially fatal hepatitis C virus and exposed patients to HIV, too.
The discovery led to the biggest public health notification operation in U.S. history, brought demands for investigations and caused scores of lawyers to seek out patients at risk for infections.
Thousands of patients are being urged to be tested for the viruses. Six acute cases of hepatitis C have been confirmed. The surgical center and five affiliated clinics have been closed.
“I find it baffling, frankly, that in this day and age anyone would think it was safe to reuse a syringe,” said Michael Bell, associate director for infection control at the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
One of the infected patients is retired airplane mechanic Michael Washington, 67, who was the first to report his infection. On the advice of his doctor, he received a routine colon exam in July at the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada.
In September, he started to get sick. He was losing weight fast. His urine turned dark. His stomach hurt. By January, it was clear what had happened.
Washington describes his virus as a “creeping death sentence” and worries that others will hear his story and think twice before getting preventive care they need.
In letters that began arriving this week, patients who received injected anesthesia at the endoscopy center from March 2004 to mid-January were urged to get tested for hepatitis B and C, and HIV.
Because all three viruses are transmitted by blood, they could have been passed from one patient to the next by the unsafe practices at the clinic.
The mass notification is the result of a health district investigation that began in January when officials linked an uptick of unusual hepatitis C cases to the clinic.
Health officials say they are most worried about the spread of hepatitis C, which targets the liver but shows no symptoms in as many as 80 percent of infections.
Hepatitis C results in the swelling of the liver and can cause stomach pain, fatigue and jaundice. It may eventually result in liver failure. Even when no symptoms occur, the virus can slowly cause damage to the liver.
Officials estimate that 4 percent of the patients already had the virus when they entered the clinic, compared with 0.5 percent for hepatitis B and less than 0.5 percent for HIV. Hepatitis C also is easier to transmit than HIV, they said.
“You put the two together and hepatitis C is really our big concern,” said Brian Labus, senior epidemiologist at the Southern Nevada Health District.
Health inspectors say they observed clinic staff using the same syringe twice to extract anesthesia from a single vial, which was then inappropriately used to treat more than one patient. The practice allows contaminated blood in a used syringe to taint the vial and infect the next patient.
Of the six patients so far diagnosed with acute hepatitis C, five received treatment at the clinic on the same day in late September.
Since 1999, the CDC counts 14 hepatitis outbreaks in the U.S. linked to bad injection practices.
The largest outbreak occurred in Fremont, Neb., where 99 cancer patients were infected at an oncology center from 2001 to 2002. At least one died. The doctor involved in the case acknowledged reusing syringes and settled scores of lawsuit. But he never explained why the syringes were reused.
Bell said such improper procedures appear to be more common in outpatient surgical centers like the endoscopy center. Unlike hospitals, such centers often do not have employees whose sole responsibility is to monitor and educate staff on best practices.
In Las Vegas, clinic staff told inspectors they had been ordered by management to reuse the vials and syringes. Labus described the practice as an unwritten, but long-practiced policy.
Investigators were told the practice was an attempt to cut costs, according to a letter of complaint from the city, which revoked the facility’s business license Friday. Five other facilities affiliated with the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada also had their licenses revoked.
The clinic’s majority owner, Dipak Desai, a political contributor and member of the governor’s commission on health care, has refused to comment on the allegations.
He released a statement expressing concern for the patients and assuring the public the problems had been corrected. He later took out a full-page ad in Sunday’s edition of the Las Vegas Review-Journal insisting that needles had not been reused and that the chances of contracting an infection at the center in most of the last four years were “extremely low.”
Of the thousands of people who have rushed to be tested, many will get positive results, Labus said. More than 15,000 people already have called the health district for information.
But it takes a more sophisticated test, a complete evaluation of risk factors and a clear pattern of infection to determine whether the virus was caught at the facility.
Plenty of lawyers are wading into the mess. Television ads called “health alerts” are soliciting clients. At least a handful of class-action lawsuits have been filed.
On Tuesday, the office of Las Vegas attorney Ed Bernstein was buzzing with phone calls — nearly 1,000 a day, he said. Bernstein said he represents about 1,200 patients at the facility, eight who have tested positive for hepatitis C.
Washington, the infected airplane mechanic, is one of Bernstein’s clients.
His wife, Josephine, a registered nurse, wonders how any health care professional could be so reckless: “To maximize profit? For what? What are you going to save?”
___
On the Net:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: http://www.cdc.gov/
